Sunday, March 9, 2008

At L.A. school, Singapore math has added value (ExTRa CREdiT # 2)

In 2005, just 45% of the fifth-graders at Ramona Elementary School in Hollywood scored at grade level on a standardized state test. In 2006, that figure rose to 76%. What made this huge difference? The difference between the two years may have been Singapore math. In the beginning of the 2005-06 school year, Ramona began using textbooks developed for use in Singapore, a Southeast Asian city-state whose students consistently rank No. 1 in international math comparisons. Ramona's math scores rapidly rose. "It's wonderful," said Principal Susan Arcaris. "Seven out of 10 of the students in our school are proficient or better in math, and that's pretty startling when you consider that this is an inner-city, Title 1 school." Ramona easily qualifies for federal Title 1 funds, which are intended to alleviate the effects of poverty. Nine of every 10 students at the school are eligible for free or reduced-price lunches. For the most part, these are the children of immigrants, the majority from Central America, and some from Armenia. Nearly six in 10 students speak English as a second language. The decision to approve the books could place California ahead of the national curve. The National Mathematics Advisory Panel, appointed by President Bush, will issue a report Thursday that is expected to endorse K-8 math, in many ways, are very similar to the Singapore curriculum. Although this curriculum is very successful in many ways, not all teachers like it, and not all use it. The Singapore books aren't easy for teachers to use without training, and some veterans are more comfortable with the curriculum they have always followed. But you can tell when you walk into a classroom using Singapore math. The Singapore curriculum "requires a considerable amount of math background on the part of the teachers who are teaching it," said Milgram, "and in the elementary grades, most of our teachers aren't capable of teaching it. . . . It isn't that they can't learn it; it's just that they've never seen it." So based on the teachers attitude towards this curriculum, the students will either improve or just stay the same or even get worse. I thought this article was very intriguing how America is restoring to countries in Asia for help in education. I hope this curriculum doesn’t come to New Jersey because based on this article, it would be very hard.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-math9mar09,1,2133870.story?track=rss

No comments: